Trapdoor Collector Discussion Board

[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
[ Previous | Previous in Thread | Next ]


Re: Al Frasca article in Man At Arms

Posted by Dick Hosmer on Thursday, 27 October 2016, at 7:38 p.m., in response to Re: Al Frasca article in Man At Arms, posted by Al Frasca on Thursday, 27 October 2016, at 5:37 p.m.

Yes, thanks, but no need - I have my recorded measurements (averaged by arm type) and, yes, the line locations DO vary somewhat from model to model.

I will say this: all of the other common/normal/standard arms and sights viewed had the large numbers with all lines in place. Given that, it would SEEM that any variations in the sight would PROBABLY occur at the very beginning (like 62) and I would guess that any subsequent occurrences MIGHT indicate a replacement for some reason. 62 is in "attic mint" condition, showing quite a bit lot of storage rash but almost zero "wear".


Responses


Post a New Response

Your Name:

E-Mail Address:

Subject:

Please answer the riddle feature to prevent spam:    2 + 16 + 3 =

Message:



Return to the Trapdoor Collector home page via this link.