Trapdoor Collector Discussion Board

[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
[ Previous | Previous in Thread | Next in Thread | Next ]


Re: Article in Man At Arms

Posted by John on Saturday, 10 September 2011, at 11:01 p.m., in response to Re: Article in Man At Arms, posted by Dick Hosmer on Saturday, 27 August 2011, at 12:09 a.m.

Finally received my copy today.

I am even more skeptical than I was having just the comments here to go on.

I may be wrong (not the first, or probably last time) but I see lots of smoke but very little fire.

Association of Firearm and Tool Mark Examiners forensics experts can make positive matches between some guns and cases, but I think whoever did this study is drawing conclusions based more on wishful thinking than verifiable scientific proof. A large comparison microscope view of the purported firing pin imprint match would be a good start to gain credibility.

That is without even addressing any possible problems with a gun, the first which bothers me is having a SA style script P firing proof on the "field replacement" stock.

It is a great story, but fiction or non-fiction? - the buyer can decide.

Caveat emptor!


Responses


Post a New Response

Your Name:

E-Mail Address:

Subject:

Please answer the riddle feature to prevent spam:    6 + 3 + 3 =

Message:



Return to the Trapdoor Collector home page via this link.